|
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
ONLINE |
|
PIPELINE |
|
|
|
New Dry Glaze System for Glass Railing |
|
The latest development in Glass Railing technology, the Wagner PanelGrip™ facilitates the quick assembly of structural glass railing -- without messy fillers or special tools -- with significant savings in labor and shipping costs.
PanelGrip™ -- patent pending -- utilizes a unique, light-weight shoe moulding design with a mechanical locking mechanism that simplifies the process of glass railing installation. The system exceeds structural code requirements and has been extensively tested per ASTM E935, Standard Test Methods for Performance of Permanent Railing Systems and Rails for Buildings.
Wagner expects to have sufficient product available for sale sometime in July. However, samples are available and will shipped upon request. If you would like a sample of Wagner's PanelGrip™ assembly, contact Wagner. |
|
Raw Material Costs Continue to Rise |
|
The demand for metals remains high and the costs continue to rise with the demand. Since January, Stainless steel has gone up 11%, aluminum is up 13%, bronze is up 18% and steel has gone up a whopping 54%.
Despite this, Wagner is being selective in implementing price increases -- in particular with Wagner standard products. Any price change will be solely based on the increase in cost in the metal content of a part.
However, please be aware of the current market conditions and note that a quote from Wagner does not hold the material for your order. The quoted price, material availability and lead time will be updated when your order is placed. |
|
Clarifying Handrail Clearance |
|
Required clearance between a handrail and other building elements continues to confound and confuse. Here's a quick review of where present codes now stand.
The 1992 Americans With Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) stated that there was to be an absolute dimension of 1-1/2" between a handrail and a wall. This was actually a "grab bar" dimension which was part of an old version of ANSI A117.1. It's purpose was to avoid someone from getting caught between the wall and the handrail. ANSI changed the notation to 1-1/2" minimum in 1990.
This was not the case with ADAAG which took 12 years to be updated. The 2004 ADAAG -- presently still making its way through the Federal approval process -- now requires a 1-1/2" minimum, as does the ICC, IRC and ANSI A117.1. Though the original ADAAG is still being applied across the country, the Access Board's position is that the new ADAAG reflects their response to questions regarding accessibility and should supercede the 1992 guidelines.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) however is not on the same page with their requirements. Originally created as part of their building code -- NFPA 5000 -- but now included in NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, the NFPA requires a 2-1/4" clearance between the wall and the handrail. This may result in a railing that will be passed by the building inspector but is not accepted by the fire inspector.
Codes also generally require that there be a 1-1/2" clearance between the underside of the handrail and any obstruction -- including the horizontal bracket arm. There is an allowance however for variations in the handrail size -- for every 1/2" of additional perimeter dimension over 4", you may subtract 1/8" from the clearance requirement. For example:
|
Outside Diameter
|
Perimeter |
Subtract from 1-1/2" Requirement |
Clearance From Underside of Railing |
|
1.25" |
3.92" |
|
1-1/2" |
|
1.50" |
4.71" |
-1/8" |
1-3/8" |
|
1.66" |
5.21" |
-1/4" |
1-1/4" |
|
1.90" |
5.97" |
-1/2" |
1" |
|
2.00" |
6.28" |
-1/2" |
1" |
As always, we strongly recommend that you confirm all code issues with your local officials prior to specifying. |
Climbability Study Completes Peer Review |
After three years of review, the ICC Code Technology Committee (CTC) effectively put the climbable guard issue to rest by voting unanimously to accept a Final Report and recommend no further action on the issue. The decision took place during the CTC’s 15th meeting, which was held in Baltimore, MD, May 21–22, 2008.
In February 2007, the National Ornamental and Miscellaneous Metals Association (NOMMA) commissioned the NAHB Research Center to conduct a comprehensive research study on the topic of “climbable guards.” The report was formerly released to the CTC in October 2007. In December, a Draft Final Report was issued, but the CTC said they were awaiting the results of a peer review before giving final approval. In the spring of 2008, NOMMA again retained the NAHB Research Center to oversee a review of the 116-page document, which was completed in April 2008.
The exhaustive peer review is now Appendix C of NOMMA’s official report, and adds an additional 60 pages to the document, which is officially titled “Review of Fall Safety of Children Between the Ages of 18 Months and 4 Years in Relation to Guards and Climbing in the Built Environment.” All documentation regarding this issue can be viewed at http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/cc/ctc/Climbable.html.
While the CTC’s recent vote effectively ends the climbable guard review by the ICC, it is important to note that the issue may resurface in future code proposals. However, the CTC’s final vote and the public release of NOMMA’s study will provide important tools for responding to any future climbability proposals.
|
What are the Benefits of Using Shopwagner.com? |
|
|
|
|
Our Business Process Excellence program continues as we progress towards ISO certification. Complete customer satisfaction is a key goal of this initiative. Please take a moment to answer 5 quick questions about your satisfaction with Wagner. Click here to go to our survey. | |
|
|
Copyright 2008 R & B Wagner, Inc. | |
|
|
|